1 |
El jue, 21-04-2011 a las 14:30 -0500, William Hubbs escribió: |
2 |
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:20:32PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > El mié, 20-04-2011 a las 22:02 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: |
4 |
> > > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: |
5 |
> > > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to put a |
6 |
> > > > check in openrc that makes it refuse to run services if it was not used |
7 |
> > > > in the boot process. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > This is good idea to have in any case since I remember my system went |
10 |
> > > crazy after I've tried to start some service inside chroot. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > > This may work; however, I do not feel that it addresses the root cause |
13 |
> > > > of the bug. I feel that the root cause is packages unconditionally |
14 |
> > > > installing udev rules which assume everyone uses openrc. |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > I'd voted to have both implemented. |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I would vote for the first one, I still don't like "openrc" USE flag |
20 |
> > approach much because: |
21 |
> > 1. Would need to rebuild some packages when switching between init |
22 |
> > systems. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I don't think you can get away from this, no matter how you approach |
25 |
> it. The other approach I thought of is to include the udev pieces |
26 |
> directly in openrc and make it possible to build openrc with or without |
27 |
> udev integration. That will still mean you have to rebuild openrc though |
28 |
> if you want udev support. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
With mgorny's approach looks like recompiling wouldn't be needed :-/ |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
> > 2. I remember (from "logrotate" USE flag case) that using an USE flag |
35 |
> > for simply installing or not a file is not usually preferred :-/ |
36 |
> |
37 |
> In the logrotate use flag case, that decision was made because a user |
38 |
> can use INSTALL_MASK="/etc/logrotate.d" in make.conf to block those |
39 |
> files. But that argument definitely does not apply here. If the user |
40 |
> doesn't want this support what should he set INSTALL_MASK to? |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
That's true, thanks for the explanation :) |
44 |
|
45 |
> William |
46 |
> |