1 |
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-04-04, 14:31): |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 4 April 2010 10:48, Antoni Grzymala <awaria@××××××××××.pl> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Has anyone considered the immensely powerful twiki? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> No. So tell us why we should. Specifically, how does it compare to |
8 |
> MediaWiki in terms of features and performance? |
9 |
|
10 |
I don't have any particular claims on performance at hand. TWiki stores |
11 |
the data in plaintext files which may or may not be beneficial depending |
12 |
on various scenarios, the code is very mature but that of course does |
13 |
not say anything on whether the performance is good or not compared to, |
14 |
say, MediaWiki. Here [1] is a reasonably recent writeup on TWiki's |
15 |
performance. |
16 |
|
17 |
As to the features, I (contrary to sebastian in an earlier answer) quite |
18 |
like the syntax, I think it's a bit more comfortable the MediaWiki in |
19 |
popular scenarios. |
20 |
|
21 |
There's a good ACL system, it's got an integrated ticket system, a |
22 |
mobile-version plugin, and I too think the whole concept of Webs is |
23 |
neat. The search system is extensive and includes regex searching. |
24 |
|
25 |
And yeah, it's not PHP :) (no flame intended™) |
26 |
|
27 |
[1] http://www.twiki.net/blog_2008-03-25.html |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
[a] |