| 1 |
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:03:18 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 04/25/2012 09:44 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Yeah the whole idea here was to make user patches available without ebuild |
| 6 |
> > modifications or eclass dependence. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Using the "apply_user_patches_here" approach [1] that Ciaran suggested, |
| 9 |
> the ebuild wouldn't need any modification unless it overrides |
| 10 |
> default_src_prepare. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Which is a very large number of ebuilds. :) But it's a step in the right |
| 13 |
direction. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> There is not necessarily any "eclass dependence", |
| 16 |
> though the ebuild may call eclass functions such as eautoreconf when |
| 17 |
> necessary. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> [1] |
| 20 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_c228be85e0c4e577ad194e6004d59062.xml |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
fonts, gcc-porting |
| 26 |
toolchain, wxwidgets |
| 27 |
@ gentoo.org |
Archives