| 1 |
On 04/03/10 16:36, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> This also raises the question of license. Our current documentation |
| 3 |
> mostly uses the CC-BY-SA license, while the unoffical wiki adds a |
| 4 |
> non-commercial restriction. By choosing one license over the other |
| 5 |
> we will make copy-pasting content from the source that has the other |
| 6 |
> license, as far as I can see, illegal. I would say that interchange |
| 7 |
> possibilities with our existing official documentation has priority. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Good point. I agree that a restriction against commercial usage does |
| 10 |
not work for us. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Sebastian |
Archives