1 |
Le vendredi 24 juin 2011 à 12:37 +0200, Ulrich Mueller a écrit : |
2 |
> >>>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > There's no reason that a dozen of packages PDEPENDs on |
5 |
> > bash-completion. If one decides not to use bash-completion any |
6 |
> > longer, I don't see a reason to rebuild all those packages just to |
7 |
> > get rid of one PDEPEND (and a single file). |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The question is where to draw the line: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> "There's no reason that a dozen of packages RDEPENDs on emacs. If one |
12 |
> decides not to use emacs any longer, I don't see a reason to rebuild |
13 |
> all those packages just to get rid of one RDEPEND (and a single |
14 |
> file)." |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Same argument. ;) Should packages install their emacs support files |
17 |
> (it's only one or two small files in most cases) unconditionally? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> But seriously: I believe that most people would agree that logrotate |
20 |
> config files should be installed unconditionally, whereas in the case |
21 |
> of emacs they would disagree. bash-completion is somewhere inbetween. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Ulrich |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
Well I'd be in favor of installing emacs support files unconditionally |
27 |
even though I don't use emacs and I'm not a fan of "wasted space". I |
28 |
feel like we have enough means for people who care about space to get |
29 |
rid of these. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
33 |
Gentoo |