Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
gentoo-dev@g.o
|
|
From:
|
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
|
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:01:00 -0400
|
|
On Thursday 13 October 2011 14:15:54 Sebastian Luther wrote:
> WARNING: One or more updates have been skipped due to a dependency
> conflict:
>
> dev-python/numpy:0
> (dev-python/numpy-1.6.0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts
> with ~dev-python/numpy-1.5.1 required by
> (sci-mathematics/sage-4.7.1-r2::sage-on-gentoo, installed)
>
> dev-python/pexpect:0
> (dev-python/pexpect-2.4-r1::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
> merge) conflicts with ~dev-python/pexpect-2.0 required by
> (sci-mathematics/sage-4.7.1-r2::sage-on-gentoo, installed)
>
> Fact is that sci-mathematics/sage can't be made work without those deps.
> Fact is that I want this package and couldn't care less if I have the
> latest version of these other two packages.
>
> If in turn I cared for the other two packages, then I would have to
> remove sage. It's a choice but nothing else.
it's a crap choice. users shouldn't have to select from diff sets of packages
because some are too broken to work properly. it's a bug and needs to be
fixed. and it shouldn't require twisting of arms to make people fix their
broken packages.
also, sci-mathematics/sage is a poor example here. it isn't in the main tree.
if people want to add poor packages to their overlays, they're free to.
-mike
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|