| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about USE=oldnet |
| 4 |
> have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and should be treated as |
| 5 |
> such. |
| 6 |
> -mike |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such |
| 10 |
changes in future. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I was told that new openrc is surely fine because it works for some |
| 13 |
group of people, that obviously includes developer. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It is not enough, and please, don't keep such things in the future in |
| 16 |
more or less closed circles of your pals. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Even simple "WARNING!!! Big changes, untested, not(yet) documented!" |
| 19 |
would be nice. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I know what arch~ _should_ mean, but you know what it actually means. |
| 22 |
So, a little bit of pragmatic flexibility here would certainly decrease |
| 23 |
amount of raining urine and improve Gentoo's likability. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
In any event, I don't intend to further this debate. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Take it as a rant of some user that certainly can be wrong. |
Archives