1 |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> John Brooks wrote: |
3 |
>> Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed |
4 |
>> packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or |
5 |
>> try to go for something more category/package specific (herds, etc). |
6 |
>> Lots of work for bugwranglers, though. There is a huge difference to |
7 |
>> developers between an unmaintained package with no progress and just |
8 |
>> looking over an ebuild that has been used successfully by several |
9 |
>> people. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> No need for an additional mail/bugzie alias here, we could simply use a |
12 |
> KEYWORD like the existing 'Inclusion' (which isn't used that much for |
13 |
> now, 63 open bugs have that keyword) or a new 'HasPatch' as a |
14 |
> counterpart for 'NeedPatch'. |
15 |
|
16 |
(This email isn't targeted towards Tobias - just replying) |
17 |
|
18 |
What is wrong with the KEYWORD called 'EBUILD' defined as: "Marks an |
19 |
issue to be a user submitted ebuild." ? You can easily make a search |
20 |
that is assigned to maintainer-needed and has the EBUILD keyword (or |
21 |
any keyword).[1] |
22 |
|
23 |
I feel like you guys are trying to solve issues related to an |
24 |
underlying problem but not actually targeting the problem itself. The |
25 |
main issue is a lack of man-power. Also, devs willing to maintain |
26 |
packages but then later retiring and leaving the packages in limbo. |
27 |
Maybe there should be some policy such as, when devs retire if no one |
28 |
else steps up to maintain the package, then it automatically gets |
29 |
moved to sunrise overlay and only maintained packages stay in the |
30 |
portage tree. This would cut down on our current 247 maintainer-needed |
31 |
bugs[2] or our 35 bugs assigned to maintainer-needed with 'bump' in |
32 |
the summary[3]. However, keep in mind that we do have 497 bugs |
33 |
assigned to anyone with 'bump' in the summary[4]. |
34 |
|
35 |
Just some thoughts to ponder, |
36 |
Jeremy |
37 |
|
38 |
[1]: http://tinyurl.com/6y653y |
39 |
[2]: http://tinyurl.com/6olohq |
40 |
[3]: http://tinyurl.com/5d3tfl |
41 |
[4]: http://tinyurl.com/689y5p |