1 |
i think we've seen enough improvement/bugfixes in ~arch sandbox over |
2 |
current stable sandbox-1.6 and things have settled down. there are |
3 |
certainly a few bugs open that arent technically regressions with |
4 |
sandbox-1.6 to older versions, but are none the less causing problems |
5 |
for current stable packages. |
6 |
|
7 |
i'm aiming sandbox-2.3 as the start of the new stable series, so i'd |
8 |
like people to really thrash on it. obviously if it turns out to be |
9 |
not-so-hawt, i'll do sandbox-2.4 and have it be the new stable |
10 |
candidate. yes, this is common sense, but explicitly stating it to |
11 |
avoid the tossers who might try and nitpick. |
12 |
-mike |