Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Subject: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:53:04 -0500
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote:
> - people complain that a week-long timeout is too short, while after I
> CC arches the answer often comes within minutes.

So, I agree with pretty-much everything you said, and I completely
agree that stable-by-default, object-if-you-care is the right move.
That said, there is probably room for debate over the length of time
we leave the bug open.  Maybe a week isn't quite long enough - maybe
two weeks is better.

Then again, if I as a maintainer had reservations I'd be very likely
to at least post a comment within a week even if I couldn't actually
resolve the issue decisively in that time.

Rich


Replies:
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Andreas K. Huettel
References:
making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- justin
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
-- Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by thread:
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Previous by date:
Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date
Next by date:
Re: Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.