From: | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative | ||
Date: | Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:20:52 | ||
Message-Id: | 20100401111827.GM11663@hrair | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | Summarizing ciaran's claim to end this nonsense- |
2 | |
3 | VALID_USE isn't useful because use cycle breaking can't be done |
4 | according to strictures he desires, as such VALID_USE is pointless |
5 | because pkg_pretend can cover it. |
6 | |
7 | It's a bit brief and likely left out an insult or two, but it's to |
8 | the point at least and doesn't need more expounding of his views. |
9 | |
10 | So does anyone _other_ then ciaran care to comment? Thinking I may |
11 | write this up as a glep as an attempt to start pushing PMS changes |
12 | into a more visible and documented light. |
13 | |
14 | ~harring |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> |