Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:15:11
Message-Id: 4DEE93A0.4020700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild by Mike Frysinger
1 On 06/07/2011 10:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:41:08 Mark Loeser wrote:
3 >> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" <vapier@g.o> said:
4 >>> vapier 11/05/16 03:30:02
5 >>>
6 >>> Removed: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
7 >>> Log:
8 >>> old
9 >>
10 >> Please document removal of ebuilds in ChangeLogs.
11 >
12 > waste of time. i simply wont bother removing old versions until changelogs
13 > start being autogenerated or the policy is sane again.
14
15 +1, see: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097#c75
16
17 and I have to say it's all on councils shoulders how bad of an impact
18 this will have on the tree with several devs leaving old files around or
19 leaving trivial fixes uncommitted to workaround bad policy.

Replies