Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
Subject: Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:11:39 -0600
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:28:57 +0100
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:

> And then why bother when the tree doesn't reflect PMS.

Maybe if some people would stop ignoring PMS on whim because they don't agree
with something in it this wouldn't be the case.

Like, when does this end?  Whenever there's a policy you don't agree with,
you do whatever you want?  And it's the policy that's the problem?

I don't get it.

Anyways, this has nothing to do with PMS.  Using FEATURES in the tree was
frowned upon long before it even existed.  The fact that it wasn't documented
as such outside of mailing lists and bug reports is the real bug.


-- 
fonts,                             Character is what you are in the dark.
gcc-porting,
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
-- Patrick Lauer
References:
FEATURES use or misuse?
-- Patrick Lauer
Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
-- Patrick Lauer
Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
-- Patrick Lauer
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
Previous by date:
Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
Next by date:
Re: FEATURES use or misuse?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.