From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? | ||
Date: | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:18:47 | ||
Message-Id: | 201110302017.48281.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? by "Petteri Räty" |
1 | On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:33:51 Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 | > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 | > > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, |
4 | > > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for |
5 | > > keeping these before i punt them ? |
6 | > |
7 | > Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break |
8 | > backwards compatibility as long as an eclass exists? |
9 | |
10 | do you have any actual examples ? |
11 | -mike |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |