1 |
On Saturday 24 June 2006 00:07, James Potts wrote: |
2 |
> There is a problem here for the java folks...Technically, their |
3 |
> migration-overlay is an overlay, and technically, that overlay is |
4 |
> currently unofficial. Therefore, technically, if it is against the |
5 |
> rules for projects and/or devs to use bugzilla for unofficial |
6 |
> overlays. then it is against the rules for the java team to use |
7 |
> bugzilla for their migration-overlay. |
8 |
|
9 |
what rules ? |
10 |
|
11 |
> As for the fact that the migration overlay is in the process of being |
12 |
> moved to o.g.o, "in the process of" doesn't mean it's already been |
13 |
> done, and until it's finished, the above statement stands. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Props *and* apologies to the java team for this, but it looks like you |
16 |
> need to move the overlay *before* you finish the migration process |
17 |
> now. |
18 |
|
19 |
the java overlay has existed far longer than overlays.g.o. to demand they |
20 |
halt all development and they move their stuff from gentooexperimental.org to |
21 |
overlays.g.o so they can suddenly be allowed to use bugzilla/gentoo infra is |
22 |
just asine. |
23 |
|
24 |
java devs are getting work done, dont sit there and waste their time with |
25 |
rules such as this. |
26 |
-mike |