Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Skarby <christian@××××××.no>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: mz269@××××××××.hu
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage suggestion
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:57:54
Message-Id: 3134.10.0.7.104.1029255855.squirrel@home.skarby.no
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage suggestion by Christian Skarby
1 Sorry about not reading the initial mail twice,
2 what you really wanted were that portage should start to compile
3 A as soon as it has what that is required, and download B (and possibly C)
4 while it start to, and compiles A. What I've suggested will not do that.
5
6 =)
7
8 Christian
9
10 > I belive it could be achieved by doing this:
11 >
12 > emerge --fetchonly A B && emerge A B
13 > or
14 > emerge -f A B && emerge A B
15 > for short
16 >
17 > Even though it would be nice to have a flag like --fetchfirst (so that
18 > one do not need to list the ebuilds twice, I still think the
19 > portage-system will have to go through it twice.)
20 >
21 > BTW what is the id-bug-number of your bug?
22 > (I believe that it would be nice if we post that as a reference in
23 > situations like this.)
24 >
25 > All the best,
26 > Christian
27 >
28 >> Hi!
29 >>
30 >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Dan Naumov wrote:
31 >>> Submit this suggestion to Gentoo BugZilla.
32 >> OK, I did. How long time can it take to develop and commit such a
33 >> feature to the main portage tree?
34 >>
35 >> Zizi
36 >>
37 >>
38 >> _______________________________________________
39 >> gentoo-dev mailing list
40 >> gentoo-dev@g.o
41 >> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
42 >
43 >
44 >
45 > _______________________________________________
46 > gentoo-dev mailing list
47 > gentoo-dev@g.o
48 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev