Archives
Archives
| From: | Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:22:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | g8dvro$ld1$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2 by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >every time I try to emerge -NuD system |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I think there's a good case for system and world without the set specifier |
| 6 | working the way they always have. I for one am very aware if I type in |
| 7 | @world (ie not system, useful for -e) vs world. I don't see any benefit to |
| 8 | the user in jettisoning the existing metaphor. What do others think? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |