1 |
On 11/28/2010 01:56 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
2 |
> 2010-11-28 21:30:47 Zac Medico napisaĆ(a): |
3 |
>> It seems like the problem here is that we don't have separate profiles |
4 |
>> for stable and unstable keywords. The obvious solution would be to have |
5 |
>> separate profiles, mask the flags in the stable profiles, and unmask the |
6 |
>> flags in the unstable profiles. That way, repoman would continue to |
7 |
>> protect stable profile users from unsatisfiable dependencies, without |
8 |
>> unnecessarily masking those choices from unstable profile users. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I would prefer small number of additional files instead of huge proliferation of profiles. |
11 |
> You also suggested using EAPI="4"-specific profiles instead of EAPI-versioned files, so eventually |
12 |
> we might have about 4 times more profiles :) . |
13 |
|
14 |
It would only be 2 times in profiles.desc, since my suggestion regarding |
15 |
the EAPI 4 profiles was to deprecate the older profiles and drop them |
16 |
from profiles.desc. |
17 |
-- |
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
Zac |