| 1 |
On 8/10/10 9:51 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hardcoding paths is a bad design™. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Well, yeah, it could be done better. Hmm, I will think more about it. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On 8/10/10 9:54 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: |
| 7 |
> Why can chromium not do like firefox and others and make the plugins |
| 8 |
> dir scalable via a wrapper script. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I will ask upstream about that. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On 8/10/10 9:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 13 |
> some plugins like to change their behavior based on the path they're |
| 14 |
> loaded from ... -mike |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Could you give an example? I'm just curious. Different distros use |
| 17 |
different paths, so that could lead to problems. Or are they trying to |
| 18 |
recognize the running distro? |
Archives