| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 15:30, Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Why does anyone need to *add* a package that is maintainer-needed? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Regardless of how we might want to get rid of m-n packages, I do |
| 5 |
wonder about who commits them, and why. For example, while looking |
| 6 |
into the list of m-n packages, I also found |
| 7 |
dev-python/remoteobjects-99999999, which was also entered into the |
| 8 |
tree by vapier as m-n. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
vapier, what's the rationale behind including these packages in the |
| 11 |
tree? And if you need them, why can't you maintain them? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
(I'm asking this as a member of the Python project, where we probably |
| 14 |
wouldn't mind picking up some python m-n packages.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Dirkjan |
Archives