Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: Reviving GLEP33
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:06:21 +0200
Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> said:
> On 7 August 2010 02:18, Brian Harring <ferringb@...> wrote:
> > The thing you're ignoring out of this g55 idiocy is that people don't
> > particularly seem to want it.  There has been an extremely vocal
> > subgroup of paludis/exherbo devs pushing for it while everyone else
> > seems to have less than an interest in it.  That's generalizing a
> > bit, but is reasonably accurate.
> 
> Exactly. This is Gentoo. Let Exherbo devs go develop their own distro
> and stop trying to interfere with Gentoo. It is time the council puts
> a definite stop to GLEP 55.

if the council should stop anything, then rude behavior like you have 
shown. I am personally much in favor for GLEP55, as it solves a technical 
problem that keeps coming up and have no association with Exherbo at all.

If you want to constructively contribute to Gentoo, i'd hope you 
reconsider a message like the above before sending it next time.


> 
> > _EITHER WAY_, rather than having g33 get beat down for unrelated
> > reasons by people screaming they want their pony/g55, g33 can proceed
> > despite claims to the contrary, and it doesn't require g55 as
> > ciaran/crew have claimed.
> 
> I for one am a strong supporter of GLEP 33. I believe it is one of the
> most promising ways to move forward. And I hope the council decides to
> get behind this.

I for one am a strong supporter of GLEP 55. I believe it is one of the
most promising ways to move forward. And I hope the council decides to
get behind this.

I also support the aims of GLEP33.

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
RFC: Reviving GLEP33
-- Matti Bickel
Re: RFC: Reviving GLEP33
-- Brian Harring
Re: RFC: Reviving GLEP33
-- Ben de Groot
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: Reviving GLEP33
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: Reviving GLEP33
Previous by date:
Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS
Next by date:
Re: status of releng project


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.