1 |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:50:01PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> then when they do upgrade to new xulrunner, it's possible to package it |
3 |
> from firefox tarball |
4 |
> mozilla upstream doesn't support this, but some other distribs are |
5 |
> packaging it[1] |
6 |
> |
7 |
> [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xulrunner/ |
8 |
> |
9 |
> but nothing in portage is requiring this, so -1 for packaging it from |
10 |
> me, as they should really upgrade to something else, like webkit-gtk... |
11 |
Can you run an app that relies on remotely served XUL under WebKit, on |
12 |
Windows, OSX, Linux with that? |
13 |
|
14 |
If so, I'll suggest it to upstream. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
18 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
19 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
20 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |