Gentoo Linux -- List Archive: gentoo-dev

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647

List Archive: gentoo-dev

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Headers:

To:	gentoo-dev@g.o
From:	Peter Stuge <peter@...>
Subject:	Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:28:05 +0200

William Hubbs wrote:
> To clarify: we should only allow fast-forward merges on master.

Not a dev yet, but +1

Attachment:

pgp1XZ58q5kUx.pgp (PGP signature)

References:

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- William Hubbs

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Ciaran McCreesh

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- William Hubbs

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Previous by thread:

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Next by thread:

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Previous by date:

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Next by date:

Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.