Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:28:31 +0200
2010-06-21 00:27:00 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> On Sunday, June 20, 2010 09:55:39 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > 2010-06-19 22:53:37 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> > > On Thursday, June 10, 2010 16:45:29 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar wrote:
> > > > 2010-06-10 22:20:44 Nirbheek Chauhan napisał(a):
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar wrote:
> > > > > > 2010-06-10 21:27:40 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> > > > > >> I see no reason to *not* add a ChangeLog entry here.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ChangeLog entries are not required for trivial changes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > A "trivial" change is fixing a typo, or a manifest problem, a missing
> > > > > quotation mark, etc. Anything else is not "trivial".
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anything that changes how an ebuild functions, what it does, or the
> > > > > installed files (and/or their contents) is NOT a trivial change.
> > > > 
> > > > This commit only removed some compiler warnings.
> > > 
> > > mucking with CFLAGS without documentation is wrong.  compiler warnings
> > > come and go, so a flag that was relevant one day could be completely
> > > extraneous the next.
> > > 
> > > however, especially with strict aliasing, you arent "just fixing
> > > warnings", you're changing optimization behavior of gcc to workaround
> > > broken C code. this obviously does not fall anywhere near the "trivial"
> > > mark.
> > > 
> > > i see you still havent fixed this, so get on it already.  a bug needs to
> > > be opened somewhere to get the package properly *fixed*
> > 
> > This problem is probably caused by bugs in Python 2, which have been fixed
> > in Python 3.
> 
> the new information you've provided here only reinforces the fact the current 
> code is wrong.  properly document the append-flags and properly restrict it to 
> when python-2 is being used.

I have added the comment to the ebuild. dev-python/traits supports only Python 2.

> considering python-2 is going to be in our lives for a while, how hard is it 
> to backport the changes in question to the headers ?  presumably it's 
> struct/union/cast shuffling in the headers.

I don't know what exactly would need to be backported. I suspect that Python developers
would have backported the fix if it wasn't breaking backward compatibility.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild
-- Mike Frysinger
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild
Next by thread:
RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]
Previous by date:
Re: Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Voting
Next by date:
Re: Council manifesto of sping


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.