Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass.
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:50:40
Message-Id: 20090710085026.3ea752d4@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass. by Harley Peters
1 Hi,
2
3 Harley Peters <harley@×××××××××××××.net>:
4 > Because the numbers don't look so good for Gnash.
5 > bzr branch http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/trunk
6
7 They look similar on my system to that of Emacs, although I have to
8 try with new revisions added.
9
10 > Having said that it's only a two line change to the bzr.eclass code to
11 > get it to work the way I want.
12 > And I can live with that. :)
13
14 But in the end I need to justify the changes not only for you. :)
15
16 V-Li
17
18 --
19 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
20 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
21
22 <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass. Harley Peters <harley@×××××××××××××.net>