Archives
Archives
| From: | "Paweł Hajdan |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo? |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:37:29 |
| Message-Id: | 4D7B68D3.5000409@gentoo.org |
| 1 | I wonder why pax-utils.eclass uses elog instead of just einfo. An |
| 2 | example message looks like this: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | * Fallback PaX marking -m |
| 5 | * out/Release/chrome |
| 6 | |
| 7 | IMHO it's not very useful in the elog messages, but maybe there are |
| 8 | scenarios in which it is useful. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | My idea is to just replace all elogs with einfos in pax-utils.eclass. |
| 11 | What do you think? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] pax-utils.eclass: elog -> einfo? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |