1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 12/17/2011 09:34 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
5 |
> 2011/12/16 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>: |
6 |
>> On 12/12/2011 05:44 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: |
7 |
>>> scarabeus 11/12/12 17:44:48 |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Modified: ChangeLog Added: |
10 |
>>> libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild Removed: libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild |
11 |
>>> Log: Remove miss-named beta0. Add beta1 with better name |
12 |
>>> (presented as downgrade). |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha80/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan |
15 |
>>> options: --force) |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> Revision Changes Path 1.216 |
18 |
>>> app-office/libreoffice/ChangeLog |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>> I know it is a bit late but do you think that commit made sense |
21 |
>> at that time? It is not the best user experience we can provide |
22 |
>> when beta releases appear as downgrades. FWIW beta releases |
23 |
>> should remain masked to avoid useless compilations to slow |
24 |
>> machines instead of digging through Changelogs to see what |
25 |
>> happened. Are the beta releases of libreoffice so critical that |
26 |
>> force you to keep them in the ~testing tree? |
27 |
>> |
28 |
> They should be stable enough plus it helps a lot to catch all the |
29 |
> bugs. Most of those Gentooers reported are being fixed and I think |
30 |
> it is better to test it during the beta cycle rather than start |
31 |
> messing with it after final release. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> So if you don't want those ebuild in main tree just tell me so and |
34 |
> I can add only the releases (but then I won't care about the bugs |
35 |
> much as I do this fixes as part of the upstream QA and don't use |
36 |
> Gentoo [no worries I compile/runtime test it in the dev tinderbox |
37 |
> that has gentoo], so at the point of release I should be focusing |
38 |
> on master branch again). |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Tom |
41 |
> |
42 |
You misunderstood me. I don't object to beta ebuilds but I wonder if |
43 |
testing users want to have them by default. Maybe they should be |
44 |
masked by default and whoever wants the shiny stuff can always unmask |
45 |
them. Anyway not a big deal. I guess I belong to the minority of |
46 |
people who do own a single core PC in 2011 :) |
47 |
|
48 |
- -- |
49 |
Regards, |
50 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
51 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
52 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
53 |
|
54 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJO7GcxAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCd3oQAMR8gUxPPu+tnPWkOmU5ZedK |
55 |
B7aCy09P2ecV/BvxDBf1wQOWDb19tpfXT15Rm486+pxkDovP0lhr8hbNklfHXbjE |
56 |
fB+2JYvEb5qf/zNePCNRc6LC/KaDurIx+z4RzFBOquoZbJM5Z6c8ya+w2q98YmtD |
57 |
DsB5y1jpq5Fs2eVNjDvmuzDjR0MoMPP1oE9Y0kU4D5ahpH03IdPbyCv/AjR/M3lb |
58 |
MRezGuRI7EQmrnBNdqZIJpUPHaCioxsyvIeVpw9gkprdQPC4olX8ASd90En41kA6 |
59 |
pnxK1+u1WYJKWJyCZrGROIlws8dBa/mKHn+E+SU10j4kLGIi6dYQGOghPC8g+yop |
60 |
3E4kgDlJZnXTIpnCszrdkgoqWlDNzmToV6c0D6hvc9itG2aE8vwiSKXHQMp1Lxf7 |
61 |
RGF1/gxyojB9ExUhCwWK7jFBPqhrYb88CpU5fvLRGR8VQ5zq1pM3F5yNoPg4qYdD |
62 |
U7tUdwm6UPNc9p3QfLSW93FSV4MAEzXhOuj0Kmt9AMr0n+boKyzycm44wm1R31NM |
63 |
hXoX7bhxP4r2UPRXUJBO+3FGdcxrH4YkcZ3A5yXEV/LwkgtSKsJRzyA5/VQFZCkw |
64 |
Tt5wvXqRrjW51fVfeY3SU8q/Y0W1pu46Dd1C3Vc3jR1xW8uUegVVJNizmOdOC70y |
65 |
O7p/tIdyadV9aOjsSKUs |
66 |
=oIMb |
67 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |