| 1 |
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |
| 6 |
> > wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 |
| 8 |
> >> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >>> So go claim your commits, |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Great work! |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo |
| 15 |
> >>> [2] |
| 16 |
> >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary |
| 17 |
> >> |
| 18 |
> >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest |
| 19 |
> >> commits look to be the likely cause. |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — |
| 23 |
> > another commit free with every ebuild commit! |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed |
| 26 |
> separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to |
| 27 |
> change as soon as it is committed. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
But signing quite often implies typing in password, especially if it's |
| 30 |
the first signature done in the session. That means more delay, and thus |
| 31 |
more likely for the commit to be taken as a separate one. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Best regards, |
| 35 |
Michał Górny |
Archives