Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:40:30 +0200
Marius Mauch wrote:

> As a result of Cardoes earlier mail we talked a bit about possible
> solutions in #gento-portage, and I suggested to let portage
> automatically inject the deps based on SRC_URI pattern matching.
> A mapping of extensions and their unpack deps would be kept in the tree
> (e.g. mapping '.tar.bz2' to '( app-arch/tar app-arch/bzip2 )'
> 
> Benefits:
> - simplified depstrings for most packages (I assume >90% of the tree)
> - easier maintenance if dependencies are changing, or additional
> implementations become supported (this could also be achieved with
> virtuals though)
> - potentially more accurate dependencies, as some common errors would
> be eliminated (e.g. proper treatment of use-conditionals, not adding
> unpack deps to RDEPEND)
> - long-term adds the possibility to remove bzip2, gzip and tar from
> @system
> 
> Potential problems:
> - might cause trouble for some packages that use custom code for
> unpacking, or due to circular deps, this could simply be solved with a
> new RESTRICT value though.
> - automagic deps could be confusing to devs/users
> - not available for existing EAPIs (due to the mentioned problems)
> - slightly slower dep calculations due to the extra processing
> - possible match errors
> 
> So, is this something ebuild maintainers would like in general, or does
> such a feature cause you nightmares?

Yes. I think that's something which should be done manually.



-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Re: RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies
-- Patrick Börjesson
References:
RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies
-- Marius Mauch
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies
Next by thread:
Re: Re: RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies
Previous by date:
Re: Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008
Next by date:
Re: RFC: auto-detection of unpack dependencies


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.