| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Alin Năstac wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Markos, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm very busy in real life, but I'll try to solve all squid issues this |
| 5 |
> week. |
| 6 |
> Btw, [2] and [3] were solved from net-proxy's perspective and [1] |
| 7 |
> wasn't fixed by upstream AFAIK. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Cheers, |
| 10 |
> Alin |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
Hi |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thanks for stepping up. If you need more manpower just yell and ask for help from |
| 15 |
our users. Furthermore, Kerin Millar did an excellent job on bug #311927 so |
| 16 |
you could work with him ( and co-maintain squid if you want ). That would be |
| 17 |
the best way imho to keep squid in a good shape :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Seems like my post created some noise and squid will move forward soon \o/ |
| 20 |
> On 04/08/2010 13:50, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 21 |
> > Hi there |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug #311927 and Bug #304751 require a |
| 24 |
> > version bump. Our user community did an excellent job there providing an |
| 25 |
> > improved ebuild for that. Furthermore there are several open security |
| 26 |
> > bugs wrt squid [1][2][3][4]. net-proxy herd what is your status? |
| 27 |
> > Security bugs should be your first priority. If you are unable to |
| 28 |
> > maintain certain packages you could ask for help instead of staying |
| 29 |
> > quiet. Maybe we should list this |
| 30 |
> > package as maintainer-needed and request some proxy-maintainers from our |
| 31 |
> > user community. What do you think about that? |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > @Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every |
| 34 |
> > single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are |
| 35 |
> > active and which are dead |
| 36 |
> > |
| 37 |
> > @QA: Should step up and commit these ebuilds just to get |
| 38 |
> > rid of the security bugs which, frankly, don't look that good ( distro |
| 39 |
> > wise ). I know technically is not our job, but we need to step up here |
| 40 |
> > and either fix the security bugs since net-proxy can't do that, or mask |
| 41 |
> > this package which is a no-go. |
| 42 |
> > |
| 43 |
> > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/261208 |
| 44 |
> > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279379 |
| 45 |
> > [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279380 |
| 46 |
> > [4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/301828 |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
| 52 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 53 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |
| 54 |
Key ID: 441AC410 |
| 55 |
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 |
Archives