Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Subject: Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 20:09:31 -0800
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
> Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have
> been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both
> bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane alternative
> that every developer should be able to read.

I think forcing LC_ALL=C is crazy.

-A

>
>
>     jer
>


References:
So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
-- Jeroen Roovers
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
Next by thread:
Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
Previous by date:
So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?
Next by date:
Re: So now that we have --quiet-build as default, can we talk about a forced LC_ALL=C again?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.