Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:04:37
Message-Id: 20100814170606.GB17432@Mystical
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild by Thilo Bangert
1 On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:36PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
2 > > So you want me to force everyone to update the package just to respect
3 > > the LDFLAGS.
4 >
5 > yes. IIRC it has been stated on this list before, that a change which
6 > changes the resulting binary always needs to be done in a revbump.
7 List? Really? I use devmanual for ebuild development not list archives.
8 >
9 > > Why, since until recently, nobody gave a crap about this
10 > > kind of QA issues?
11 >
12 > Thats a bad excuse!
13 Yet it is true. The tree is flood with such packages. So my assumption is
14 correct. Maintainers didn't and still don't give a crap about this QA issue,
15 other they wouldn't commit broken packages in the first place
16 >
17 > >
18 > > Please provide a patch for devmanual to make it more clear.
19 >
20 > Good idea. Any takers?
21 >
22 > thanks
23 > kind regards
24 >
25 > Thilo
26
27
28
29 --
30 Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
31 Gentoo Linux Developer
32 Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
33 Key ID: 441AC410
34 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410

Replies