Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Stefan de Konink <skinkie@...>
Subject: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:48:47 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello,


I joined this mailinglist because of my concern pointed in:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206604


How stupid anyone could be that stores anything in /tmp. I think it is a
problem to change the default behavior of a system that in essence will
result in data loss.

As pointed out by others you should not use /tmp to store data, my
return question is then, why are the other ./tmp directories not wiped?
If any ./tmp on a partition was 'kernel' governed I could agree that a
semi-ramdisk would be gone upon reboot, or after an application was done
running. But it is not.


In any case my request would be to put a message with bells and beeps in
the ebuild that cause the /etc/conf.d/bootmisc change announcing that by
then the default option for /tmp is deletion on boot. To be consistent,
also delete /var/tmp. If anyone thinks wiping /var/tmp is evil, please
reconsider /tmp too. In my opinion WIPE_TMP should be in the same state
as RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP. Unless anyone can make sure a user knows what he
is doing, disable it.



Yours Sincerely,

Stefan de Konink

ps. No I did not have data loss, like any good admin I read before I
apply. And yes I prefer to store anything that will not cause harm, such
as extracted sources for gdb use in /tmp.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHkVb/YH1+F2Rqwn0RCsK4AJ4wEQPC5MrCrZdIEzKIjJkh+pKNoQCfX1BG
alIrUmXiM2kulk3p635PiZk=
=57tK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change
-- Roy Marples
Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change
-- Mark Loeser
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
How to force homedir on enewuser
Next by thread:
Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change
Previous by date:
Re: Upcoming Infra maintenance/downtimes: anon{cvs,svn,git}, archives, bouncer, overlays
Next by date:
Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.