Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Which of the issues I listed needs to be addressed for the scm proposal?

At least the upstream server load.

> Ok, here's the best help I can give you: Your proposal can't work. You
> can't get correct ordering reusing existing components. You can't get
> sane behaviour using your template scheme without making it aware of
> scm revisions. You can't make it scm revision aware without a hell
> of a lot of work. And if you do want to make it scm revision aware, you
> need changes to the version scheme anyway.

Other people seem to think it's feasible, I think my proposal nicer and 
giving some value for the effort of implementing it, -scm adds a some 
work to do with undefined features at best.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list