| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 03 July 2006 15:41, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > the entire point of these threads is to address developer concerns |
| 5 |
>> > to that sunrise can be folded back into Gentoo |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Really? According to who? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> presumably the Sunrise guys considering they started the thread |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
Yeah, this is right. Sunrise is meant to be Gentoo. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
>> We only just had the userrel + sunrise meeting where the people behind |
| 14 |
>> Project Sunrise said they would continue the project as an unofficial |
| 15 |
>> project. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Stefan would have to comment on this then |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
Yeah, we got frequent problems with offical/unofficial/suspended or not so |
| 20 |
much suspended. Consequently to sort out this issue we came to the |
| 21 |
conclusion to make it fully unofficial in the meeting. It works this way |
| 22 |
but it is not how I wish Sunrise to operate. It needs to have approval and |
| 23 |
that is why we discuss Sunrise and improve it constantly. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
>> Even if they have changed their minds about this, I think it is too |
| 26 |
>> early to re-evaluate the project for inclusion. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> maybe, but ignoring constant requests for feedback isnt helping anyone |
| 29 |
> -mike |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Agreed, and waiting does not help Sunrise either. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Best regards, |
| 34 |
Stefan |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives