1 |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:55:45PM +0200, Branko Badrljica wrote: |
2 |
> Main question is NOT whether it works for you, but whether it will break |
3 |
> stuff on significant percent of other users. |
4 |
> It broke on my machine, for example, and it was quite disconcerting, |
5 |
> since it was at quite inconvenient moment and I had note get to any |
6 |
> shred of documentation about ANY kind of substantial behaviour change of |
7 |
> new openrc... |
8 |
|
9 |
The default is to use the old net.ethx style network scripts, which |
10 |
still work as usual, so, that is why I said that I disagree about there |
11 |
being a regression. A regression means that something worked before, |
12 |
but it doesn't now, and that is not the case if you accept the defaults. |
13 |
|
14 |
If you accept the defaults and it doesn't work, I will gladly agree that |
15 |
there is a major regression and the package should be masked. On the |
16 |
other hand, if the new network scripts do not work, I don't see that as |
17 |
a show stopper. Yes, I would agree that there should be a warning about |
18 |
turning off the oldnet use flag, but I don't think this warrants masking |
19 |
the ebuild, unless I am missing something. If I am, definitely let me |
20 |
know. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
William Hubbs |
24 |
gentoo accessibility team lead |
25 |
williamh@g.o |