Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
gentoo-dev@g.o
|
|
From:
|
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/cdparanoia: ChangeLog cdparanoia-3.10.2-r3.ebuild
|
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:50:04 +0200
|
|
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use
> INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree.
>
> Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make
> cdparanoia's build system as clean as it is now? And then to coordinate
> them with upstream xiph.org?
> Then I see this... Not acceptable by any standards.
I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask- what is,
apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between
* removing the .a files in the ebuild
* and not building them in the first place?
(A clean build system is of course desirable, and it's great that you have
been helping upstream with that. I just dont understand how this affects "the
quality of the tree", compared to "the quality of upstream sources".)
TIA,
Andreas
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfridge@g.o
http://www.akhuettel.de/
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|