| 1 |
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:36:14 +0200 |
| 2 |
Stefan Schweizer <genstef@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >> this does not allow the actual maintainer to close the bug and |
| 5 |
> >> causes a lot of bugspam for a person who does not care about it |
| 6 |
> >> and should be only contacted in the end to commit |
| 7 |
> >> fixes/patches/bumps. |
| 8 |
> > Shouldn't matter too much as a gentoo dev is still responsible for |
| 9 |
> > the package? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> of course he is still responsible. Does not mean he likes to get 10 |
| 12 |
> mails about people asking for stable keywords and arches stabilizing |
| 13 |
> every month. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That comes with being responsible for a package in Gentoo. Live with |
| 16 |
it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> > Nobody shoud be adding stuff to portage without taking |
| 19 |
> > responsibility for it. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking |
| 22 |
> responsibility. The maintainer can always assign me bugs if he thinks |
| 23 |
> I should take care of them and I read and take care of them anyway |
| 24 |
> because I am on maintainer-needed. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That's fine and all, but it sort of sets a precedent - not everyone is |
| 27 |
on maintainer-needed. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> PS: mailing lists are a bit broken. 3 people answer me and ask almost |
| 30 |
> the same and I answer almost the same again .. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Then answer in only one subthread, and rest of them will die... :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Kind regards, |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Andrej Kacian |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives