Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/PyZilla: PyZilla-0.1.0.ebuild ChangeLog metadata.xml | ||
| Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:33:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110329153307.3fc79eea@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/PyZilla: PyZilla-0.1.0.ebuild ChangeLog metadata.xml by Nirbheek Chauhan |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:17:46 +0530 |
| 2 | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > I propose that we should be more aggressive about package.masking (for |
| 5 | > removal) all maintainer-needed packages from the tree by doing that |
| 6 | > one month after they become maintainer-needed. If someone doesn't |
| 7 | > volunteer to take care of it, it probably wasn't important anyway. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | That would never work with m-n packages that other packages *DEPEND on. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | jer |