Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Stuart Herbert" <stuart.herbert@...>
Subject: Re: Re: GLEP 42?
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:00:05 +0100
On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@...> wrote:
> Not an issue for me. It's an issue for random people writing scripts,
> for people using command line things and for people who don't want to
> use a full parser framework for some quick hack. There's no need to
> make things harder for random developers here.

Wouldn't a resolver API be the better approach to solving that?  We're
not here to support x-random number of independent, unofficial
implementations of atom parsers.

Best regards,
Stu
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Re: GLEP 42?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
References:
GLEP 42?
-- Stuart Herbert
Re: GLEP 42?
-- Zac Medico
Re: GLEP 42?
-- Brian Jackson
Re: GLEP 42?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: GLEP 42?
-- Chris Gianelloni
Re: GLEP 42?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: GLEP 42?
-- Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
Re: Re: GLEP 42?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Re: GLEP 42?
-- Stuart Herbert
Re: Re: GLEP 42?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: GLEP 42?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: GLEP 42?
Previous by date:
Re: a new TLP to "unify" programming langiages?
Next by date:
Re: a new TLP to "unify" programming langiages?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.