| 1 |
Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
1226596898.3918.4.camel@××××××××××××××××.de, excerpted below, on Thu, 13 |
| 3 |
Nov 2008 18:21:38 +0100: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Wikipedia started using an extension for marking pages as "validated". |
| 6 |
> See [1]. This would allow us to setup a group of "trusted people" |
| 7 |
> (developers, long-time users, well-known contributors - for example) who |
| 8 |
> would be able to review pages and tag them that way. Non-reviewed pages |
| 9 |
> could show a header then clearly stating that this specific page hasn't |
| 10 |
> been reviewed and might contain inaccurate information. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That sounds like a useful idea. They make it the default view. I think |
| 13 |
I'd prefer a more normal HEAD view, but with a notation at the top |
| 14 |
similar to: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"This wiki page as it appeared on <date> was<link to definition> |
| 17 |
validated</link>. <link to snapshot>Show me the validated version.</link>" |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 21 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 22 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives