1 |
El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: |
2 |
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 |
3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
6 |
> > > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
7 |
> > > > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
8 |
> > > > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
9 |
> > > > > herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think |
10 |
> > > > > we should drop that herds and move their packages to |
11 |
> > > > > maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
12 |
> > > > > |
13 |
> > > > > What do you think? |
14 |
> > > > > |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > > The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
21 |
> > - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
22 |
> > reflect reality) |
23 |
> > - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages |
26 |
> > to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
27 |
> |
28 |
> For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, |
29 |
> removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping |
30 |
> the herd. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
OK but, what about the rest? ;) |