Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Friday <bfriday@××××××××.edu>
To: Corvus Corax <corvus-ml@×××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] question on writing ebuilds with exclusive dependencies.
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:19:57
Message-Id: 40743838.4000103@lasierra.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] question on writing ebuilds with exclusive dependencies. by John Nilsson
1 Perhaps the use of the debug flag as well would be
2 appropriate. According my understanding of that use flag
3 this is a situation which would warrant or would make its
4 use feasible. I'm just a user so take my assumptions of this
5 use flags "use" with a grain of salt.
6
7 If you as the developer think the debugging on Imagemagick
8 is better then putting a einfo or something in the readme
9 would be appropriate announcing that fact. I then as a user
10 will hopefully either see that einfo message or read about
11 the better debug capabilities of Imagemagick and rebuild
12 with the command below.
13
14 USE="debug imagemagick" emerge yourapp
15
16 Or maybe I decide that speed is my goal so I build without
17 debug but with libgd
18
19 USE="gd" emerge yourapp
20
21 my 2c.
22
23 John Nilsson wrote:
24 >>if only one is present the configure script auto-detects the installed, and compiles with it,
25 >>if there are both, configure prefers libGD since it might be faster,
26 >>on the other hand ImageMagick provides better debug output when trying things out (view images on X screen ...)
27 >>so configure's behaviour can be tweaked to force usage of Imagemagick even if GD is present (or visa versa)
28 >
29 >
30 > If booth libgd and imagemagick is set I think the situation is the same
31 > as if neither is set. Go with the default.
32 >
33 > -John
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list