Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: The eight digit limit
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:42:16 +0000
PMS currently has the following:

> The package manager must not impose fixed limits upon the number of
> version components. No integer part of a version specification may
> contain more than eight digits. Package managers should indicate or
> reject any version that is invalid according to these rules.

Historically, Portage had weird bugs for excessively long version
parts, especially when leading zeroes were involved, although as far as
I'm aware it's clean with arbitrary lengths now. Paludis is clean (and
issues a QA notice for violations), but portage-utils fails the
whole version handling thing in an epic fashion.

Given this, do we still need that restriction in place? There're quite
a few violations in the tree.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: The eight digit limit
-- Luca Barbato
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-03-02 23h59 UTC
Next by thread:
Re: The eight digit limit
Previous by date:
Re: Google SOC 2008
Next by date:
Strange behavior of fonts... help :(


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.