Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Riyad Kalla <rsk@×××××××××.edu>
To: 'Henti Smith' <bain@×××××××.za>, 'Daniel Robbins' <drobbins@g.o>
Cc: veldy@×××××.net, aurelien@×××××.org, kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr, gentoo-dev@g.o, manson@g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:28:27
Message-Id: 003601c2a5e9$032c8ed0$d628c480@rsk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by Henti Smith
1 Yes this is much better than finding a culprit, lets mass-label it.
2
3 > -----Original Message-----
4 > From: Henti Smith [mailto:bain@×××××××.za]
5 > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:17 AM
6 > To: Daniel Robbins
7 > Cc: veldy@×××××.net; aurelien@×××××.org;
8 > kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr; gentoo-dev@g.o; manson@g.o
9 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
10 >
11 >
12 > On 17 Dec 2002 09:10:23 -0700
13 > Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> wrote:
14 >
15 > > I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I
16 > > don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the
17 > > ChangeLogs here:
18 >
19 > A typical western attitude. Something is broken/wrong find
20 > somebody to blame. Addapt an eastern attidute. Something is
21 > broken/wrong fix it no need to blame anybody
22 >
23 > Henti Smith
24 >
25 > --
26 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
27 >
28
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list