Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Dhruba Bandopadhyay <dhruba@××××××××××××.uk>
Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>, Gentoo User <gentoo-user@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:21:10
Message-Id: 20030320162107.GA27185@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles by Dhruba Bandopadhyay
1 On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:11:27PM +0000, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
2 > Hello,
3 >
4 > I would like to raise the following quibbles with portage. When I say
5 > world file below I am referring to /var/cache/edb/world.
6 >
7 > (1) Certain packages remain in world file even when uninstalled.
8
9 Bug.
10
11 > (2) Certain packages are installed but not added to world file.
12 >
13 > E.g. If I install evolution and that installs mozilla as a dependency
14 > then mozilla is not put in world file.
15
16 Not a bug. Dependencies don't go into world, only explicitly merged
17 packages.
18
19 >
20 > (3) Sometimes pinning an item in world file like '>=net-www/mozilla-1.3'
21 > does not stop an 'emerge -up -deep world' from downgrading it because
22 > another package like evolution wants an older version.
23
24 Not a bug. Do you _really_ want the world file to be able to break
25 dependencies?
26
27 [snip]
28
29
30 --
31 Jon Portnoy
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles Bernhard Bock <bb-mailinglists@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles Brad Laue <brad@××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles Greg <geflatt@××××××××××××.ca>