Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 06:13:27
Message-Id: 20415.8889.294499.359094@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Kent Fredric
1 >>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2012, Kent Fredric wrote:
2
3 > On 25 May 2012 13:21, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
4 >>
5 >> So I'm a bit confused. Is GitHub open source?
6
7 > Your confusion begets more confusion:
8
9 > Whether or not Github is open-source seems orthogonal to whether or
10 > not we use it, as github is a website, a service, and there are a
11 > few such websites, of which, github appears to be the defacto
12 > most-popular one.
13
14 Actually, Alec's question is not so far-fetched. The Gentoo Social
15 Contract says that Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software
16 unless it is open source.
17
18 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>