| 1 |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ralph Sennhauser <sera@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Also, there still should be a bug at b.g.o and git format-patch works |
| 6 |
>> just fine for that. Maybe it's only github now but how many places is a |
| 7 |
>> developer supposed to monitor? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm actually a little torn on this one. I'm fine with keeping the |
| 10 |
> "master" on Gentoo in the sense that this is where the rsync tree gets |
| 11 |
> generated. However, gitbub has a lot of tools like pull requests that |
| 12 |
> could potentially improve workflow, especially for things like proxy |
| 13 |
> maintainers. So, letting those teams work more outside of Gentoo and |
| 14 |
> just push their changes into Gentoo might make sense. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So I'm a bit confused. Is GitHub open source? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Perhaps github should be viewed as a widely-shared overlay that gets |
| 20 |
> automatic updates from the main tree in the master branch (or whatever |
| 21 |
> we call it). You can work on a branch in github, get it where you |
| 22 |
> want it to be, and then push it to Gentoo pretty easily. When I don't |
| 23 |
> have access to an upstream repository I often just push a copy to a |
| 24 |
> fork on Github just to make my own life easier. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Rich |
| 27 |
> |
Archives