| 1 |
> >>>>> On Sun, 6 May 2012, Andreas K Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> > I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any |
| 3 |
> > office variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they |
| 4 |
> > should work with anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge". |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > This is why I like the new category "office-plugins" best... and |
| 7 |
> > would like to implement that one. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Is there any chance that there will be more than one or two office-* |
| 10 |
> categories in future? If not, I think that we shouldn't introduce a |
| 11 |
> new category prefix for this. The category should be named app-* |
| 12 |
> instead. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> How about app-ooo, following the naming of the virtual? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ulrich |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Well... we're already breaking that rule by having lxde-base, perl-core, sec- |
| 19 |
policy... and kde-*, rox-*, xfce-* exist only twice. So I would not handle |
| 20 |
this requirement too strongly. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
(I could e.g. imagine categories office-templates, office-filters, but that's |
| 23 |
right now pure speculation.) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
app-ooo kind of minimizes the "ah yes I know what goes there" effect. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 30 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 31 |
kde, sci, arm, tex, printing |
Archives