1 |
On 04/04/2010 04:48 AM, Joshua Saddler wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:16:32 +0200 Tobias Scherbaum |
3 |
> <dertobi123@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> - Our formerly outstanding documentation still is somewhat |
6 |
>> maintained, but that's it. I haven't seen any new additions (both |
7 |
>> to our docs, but also to our docs-team) for years. People are |
8 |
>> constantly asking for a documentation wiki, but ... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Thanks for sh**ting on my efforts. There are lots of visible changes, |
11 |
> and I make a point of getting the word out when a new guide turns up |
12 |
> in /doc/. I blog about the new docs I add, and I spend awhile working |
13 |
> with contributors to make sure we get good stuff out there and that |
14 |
> it's constantly updated -- the Openbox guide Nate Zachary wrote comes |
15 |
> to mind. I'm also always working with developers who are writing docs |
16 |
> in their spare time, coaching 'em through the process, assisting with |
17 |
> GuideXML, taking patches, *and* creating patches and updates for devs |
18 |
> who are posting documents in /proj/ and in their personal devspace. |
19 |
> But I guess that doesn't mean anything to you. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
But isn't there a problem when it's my not our effort? Ideally we would |
23 |
have a couple people like you on board. If we stayed quiet about our |
24 |
perceptions then there was never the opportunity to correct them. I |
25 |
think the thread was done done constructively not destructively. |
26 |
|
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Petteri |